How could it not have been the same source, albeit one that was one generation away from the masters here? And I've yet to be told how one can remove reverb from a recording that has it. There's no "If" Roger - do you doubt what I'm telling you - we did nothing to the tapes but EQ them in a nice way so they were not quite as shrill, just like you would have done with any of your releases from similar-sounding tapes. Beyond the small amount of EQ, nothing at all was done. Do you think we added reverb to one track? Just in case you do, let me say it again - no. No. No. No reverb was added to anything. The only time we add a little reverb is when a recording is so ugly and dry that it sounds pathetic, i.e. Taras Bulba, and the result of adding natural room ambience to THAT recording was, for everyone who heard it, astonishing. So, unless Cloud Nine was done from some other tape, which would most likely be completely impossible since it duplicates the LP program straight down the line, I have no idea what any of this is about. To my ears, the Cloud Nine is rather ugly-sounding, as is its companion piece, which is not nearly as good as the first generation tapes, which I listened to as well. And every comment we've gotten on this release would seem to support my feelings about the Cloud Nine.
Are you really saying there is only drier sound on one track, the main title and therefore you prefer a release that is quite obviously not as good sounding and not from first-generation sources? I think you can see the problem here - it makes no sense unless they took that track from the film itself and why would they have?
|