I remember reading stuff from a guy on the old FILMUS-L list who would assess what the price of a new CD should be based on what he personally would consider paying for it. For example, he might have replied to an announcement of Intrada's "Hocus Pocus" CD by saying that in the first place he didn't like Bette Midler so that should mean a five dollar discount for having to look at her on the cover art, unless an alternate is supplied in which case he would consider waiving that. Second, the film is a silly Disney kids' movie about witches - a ridiculous concept for a film if he ever heard one - and that should be at least another sawbuck off the asking price. This clown would then conclude that $10 was the most he would consider paying for this - if he liked it, but as he has no familiarity with it, he should get a couple more bucks knocked off to entice him into trying it out.
He did this for years and seemed quite serious about it. I'd hate to think others who suffered from the same entitlement delusion were wandering about in these parts. Of course, there's the guy who posts over on FSM who says that because he buys maybe a couple CDs a month from Lalaland, he basically pays their salary (takes a special kind of math to work that out!) and is therefore entitled to dictate which cover art they should be using, which font for the track titles, and whatnot. God, there are times when I really hate the internet.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)